Skip to main content

Table 1 Professional status as measure of social mobility between childhood, adolescence and late adulthood

From: Socioeconomic decline and advancement within and between generations and the risk of stroke - a case-control study

Variable

Category

Cases n = 466

Controls n = 807

Model variant

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Fathers´ profession vs. subjects´ professional training

Advancement

90 (19.3%)

243 (30.1%)

0.50 (0.37–0.67)

0.58 (0.41–0.81)

0.67 (0.45–0.99)

No change

330 (70.8%)

460 (57.0%)

1.00

1.00

1.00

Descent

46 (9.9%)

104 (12.9%)

0.64 (0.43–0.95)

0.76 (0.48–1.20)

0.95 (0.59–1.53)

Fathers´ profession vs. subjects´ last profession

Advancement

110 (23.6%)

296 (36.7%)

0.52 (0.40–0.69)

0.65 (0.47–0.89)

0.77 (0.52–1.13)

No change

312 (67.0%)

423 (52.4%)

1.00

1.00

1.00

Descent

44 (9.4%)

88 (10.9%)

0.68 (0.45–1.02)

0.80 (0.50–1.28)

1.00 (0.61–1.63)

Professional training vs. last profession

Advancement

50 (10.7%)

68 (8.4%)

1.18 (0.79–1.78)

1.07 (0.67–1.72)

0.77 (0.44–1.34)

No change

355 (76.2%)

607 (75.2%)

1.00

1.00

1.00

Descent

61 (13.1%)

132 (16.4%)

0.87 (0.61–1.23)

0.96 (0.64–1.44)

0.95 (0.61–1.48)

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. alogistic regression model, conditioned on age (2-year age intervals) and sex
  3. b additionally adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, cardiac failure, number of teeth, smoking, alcohol consumption, dentist visits, physical activity, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption
  4. c additionally adjusted for socioeconomic scores in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood [2]