Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of negative binomial regression analyses on GIMD 2015 for stroke incidence and mortality (period 2016–2019)

From: The impact of regional deprivation on stroke incidence, treatment, and mortality in Germany

Stroke incidence

Model 1.1#

Model 1.2

Model 1.3ǂ

IRR

95% CI

IRR

95% CI

IRR

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

GIMD 2015

Q1, least deprived

1.0

  

1.0

  

1.0

  

Q2

1.026

1.015

1.036

1.027

1.016

1.038

1.024

1.013

1.035

Q3

1.064

1.053

1.076

1.063

1.051

1.075

1.061

1.049

1.073

Q4

1.071

1.060

1.083

1.084

1.071

1.097

1.093

1.079

1.107

Q5, most deprived

1.114

1.102

1.126

1.138

1.122

1.154

1.161

1.143

1.179

Stroke mortality

Model 2.1#

Model 2.2

Model 2.3ǂ

MRR

95% CI

MRR

95% CI

MRR

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

GIMD 2015

Q1, least deprived

1.0

  

1.0

  

1.0

  

Q2

1.011

0.986

1.036

0.998

0.972

1.024

1.006

0.980

1.034

Q3

1.049

1.022

1.076

1.051

1.022

1.081

1.064

1.033

1.095

Q4

1.102

1.075

1.129

1.083

1.052

1.115

1.110

1.075

1.146

Q5, most deprived

1.167

1.138

1.197

1.153

1.114

1.193

1.193

1.148

1.239

  1. IRR incidence rate ratio, MRR mortality rate ratio, CI confidence interval, Q1 first quintile, Q2 second quintile, Q3 third quintile, Q4 fourth quintile, Q5 fifth quintile
  2. #adjusted for year, age, and sex; adjusted for year, age, sex, and federal state; ǂadjusted for year, age, sex, federal state, and district type