Skip to main content

Diagnosis and therapy of functional tremor a systematic review illustrated by a case report

Abstract

Background

Diagnosis of functional movement disorders and specifically functional tremor (FT) (representing 50% of them) remains demanding. Additionally, due to heterogeneity of the disorders, structured concepts and guidelines for diagnosis and therapy are difficult to establish. Ascertaining the state of knowledge to derive instructions for operating procedures is the aim of this review.

Main text

Based on a standardized systematic literature research using the term “psychogenic tremor” in the MEDLINE database dating back ten years, 76 studies were evaluated. Conventional features of FT are variability of frequency and amplitude. Further, response to distraction by motor and cognitive tasks is a key diagnostic feature in differentiation between organic and functional origin. A variety of electrophysiological tests have been evaluated including surface electromyography and accelerometry to establish laboratory-supported criteria for diagnosing tremor. Also, finger tapping tests have been used to identify FT, showing positive potential as supplementary evidence.

Imaging studies in general are mostly underpowered and imaging cannot be used on an individual basis. Therapeutic studies in FT often have a diagnostic component. Cognitive behavioral therapy should be the preferred psychological treatment independent of additional psychiatric symptoms. Other psychotherapeutic methods show lack of evidence concerning FT. Relaxation techniques and physiotherapy are an important additional feature, especially in children and adolescents. In regard to drug therapy, randomized and blinded trials are not available. A significant decrease in rating scales could be detected after active, not sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a long-lasting effect. Also root magnetic stimulation seems to be effective. The clinical feature of tremor entrainment in FT can be used in combination with biofeedback as so-called tremor retrainment, using self-modulation of frequency and severity, to bring the movements under volitional control.

Conclusion

Diagnosis and treatment of FT is challenging and should include a combination of intensive clinical examination and targeted addition of standardized testing, especially electrophysiological methods. Often therapeutic effects have a diagnostic component. A multimodal strategy, considering psychological factors as a potential origin as well as maintaining effects seems to be most effective.

Introduction

The diagnosis of functional movement disorders (FMD, previously commonly referred to as psychogenic movement disorders) in general and specifically for tremor remains an ongoing clinical challenge. In individual patients it can be difficult clinically to clearly separate organic from functional movement disorders. Thus, there is a great demand for objective parameters allowing a better separation. On the other hand, this can be seen as a vicious circle as long as the clinical diagnosis remains the gold standard. Functional tremor (FT) is the most common form by representing 50% of functional movement disorders. According to the international classification of diseases in Version 10, the code F44.4 describes “psychogenic movement disorders (PMD)”, including functional forms of tremor.

Axis I in the new classification of tremor of the Movement Disorder Society is phenotype, and functional tremors are characterized by criteria such as inconsistency, sudden onset of symptoms, and variable features in terms of topographic distribution, frequency and activation characteristics [6]. A differentiation between involuntary tremor, like FT, and voluntary tremor, like malingering, is made in the classification; however, their differentiation remains difficult. Fortunately, malingering in most medical practice is uncommon.

Reduction of quality of life due to functional movement disorders, especially due to FT, is high. Structured data and concepts for diagnosis and therapy are difficult to establish due to heterogeneity. The aim here is to ascertain the current state of knowledge of the last 10 years and to derive instructions for operating procedures and future perspectives [26, 27].

Methods

Based on a standardized procedure analogous to the PRISMA criteria for systematic literature research [28], a database analysis was performed. The National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database was searched for papers published in English, dating back ten years, using the term “psychogenic tremor” and reviewed here. A literature search with the preferred term “functional tremor” was also carried out. However, this turned out to be less effective due to the unspecific term “functional”. This resulted in a tremendously high number of hits, often without any content related to the topic. Studies that did not focus on psychogenic tremor or other functional movement disorders were excluded. Finally, 76 studies were categorized into the following categories: Diagnostics in functional tremor, therapy studies (both reported below), case reports, general overviews, Parkinson disease and other movement disorders (Additional file 9: Supplementary material). The detailed process of literature search and study selection can be seen in Fig. 1. Further, we categorized the studies into three different categories (low-, moderate- and high rated) according to their quality levels. The rating category of the study is marked behind the citation with the abbreviation LR/MR/HR. The assignments and the respective quality criteria are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

flow of information, systematic review

Table 1 Study selection criteria

Results

Study categories

Diagnostics in functional tremor

Our systematic research identified 19 studies on diagnostic methods and their individual clinical value including 11 studies on patients (methods shown in Table 2). Conventional features (see Table 3) of functional tremor are variability of frequency and amplitude. The response to distraction is a key diagnostic feature in the differential diagnosis between organic and functional movement disorders. Distraction can be achieved by a variety of motor and cognitive tasks.

Table 2 Listing of diagnostic methods in functional tremor
Table 3 Clinical features of organic tremor evaluated and described in studies

To distinguish functional from organic origin in different movement disorders a variety of electrophysiological tests have been evaluated with the aim to provide objective criteria. Surface electromyography and accelerometry, pre-movement potentials electroencephalography, jerk locked back averaging, somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to identify typical features of functional movement disorders like a higher variability and entrainability, coactivation, distractibility and increase in the amplitude and frequency on mass loading tests. Movement related cortical potentials such as a Bereitschaftspotential can be seen in functional myoclonus, but this assessment is not useful for functional tremor. Further, presence of triphasic muscle contractions and an absence of co-contraction suggests functional myoclonus [20] (HR).

An electrophysiological test battery to distinguish functional tremor and organic tremor with both high sensitivity (89.5%) and high specificity (95.5%) recorded EMG and accelerometry during a loading test, response to ballistic movements, a coherence test, tonic coactivation, tapping performance and tapping response. Thirty eight patients with functional tremor achieved higher scores on the test battery than the 73 patients with organic tremor so the authors proposed it as the basis of laboratory-supported criteria for diagnosing tremor. The scores only showed an overlap in the loading test [27] (HR).

The EMG recordings can be extended by using wavelet coherence analysis (WCA). Phase differences and coherence variations between EMG signals can be analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) against a standard coherence analysis. With higher WCA values a differentiation between organic and functional tremor was possible by analyzing patient groups with different tremor forms [21] (HR).

Recording muscle pairs (wrist and elbow extensors) with EMG and performing coherence and synchronicity measurements seems to be an additional tool in the assessment of postural upper limb tremor, showing a higher synchronicity pattern in Parkinson as well as functional tremor than in essential tremor forms [32] (HR).

Finger tapping tests (FTT) have been used to identify tremor with a functional cause. The subjects performed several 30 s trials using alternate hands. Afterwards an FTT mean score was calculated. When comparing 195 patients with various tremor forms with 130 healthy adults FTT scores were significantly lower in FT when compared to the other diagnostic groups. With a cutoff FTT ratio of 0.670 or less, testing was 89.1% specific and 76.9% sensitive for the diagnosis of FT. Authors concluded that this test can be used as supplementary evidence in the diagnosis of FT [7] (HR).

In 10 patients and 5 healthy controls functional brain imaging identified tremor as essential (ET) or functional (FT) with different distributions of cerebral blood flow between the groups to distinguish the tremor forms. SPECT imaging at rest and during a tremor inducing motor task was performed. In ET, rest imaging revealed increased rCBF (relative cerebral blood flow) in cerebellar hemi- spheres and left inferior frontal gyrus. During the motor task, ET patients demonstrated increased rCBF in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and contralateral motor cortex and reduced rCBF in the cerebellum and visual cortex. In contrast, In FT imaging at rest revealed an increased relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the left inferior frontal gyrus as well as left insula. Imaging during motor task revealed increased rCBF in the cerebellum and reduced rCBF in the anterior regions of the default mode network [8] (HR).

Differences in the regional metabolic activity of the brain could be an option for differential diagnosis. In positron emission tomography (PET) hypermetabolism was seen symmetrically in both posterior medial lobes in FT, which was suggested to reflect abnormal activity with sensory integration [19] (LR). In general, most imaging studies are underpowered and thus may have many false positives. And, certainly imaging cannot be used on an individual basis.

Objective criteria useful for a positive diagnosis of functional movement disorders are highly recommended. A specific recording strategy should be applied. Polymyography coupled to accelerometry can be used to demonstrate the major electrophysiological criteria of FT, like spontaneous variability of tremor frequency and frequency entrainment during motor tasks of the contralateral side. Further, paradoxical increase of tremor amplitude during mass loading tests, a co-activation preceding the tremor onset, and an alteration of voluntary contralateral motor tasks are characteristics of FT [2] (HR).

It is suggested that functional movement disorders are more common in females. Addressing this question clinical and demographic features of males and females with FMD were evaluated [5] (HR). Of 196 FMD patients, only 30% were male. Further, they had an older age at disease onset as well as at the time of evaluation. Female patients were overrepresented in children and adolescents, but the genders were represented equally in patient older than 50 years.

Therapy studies

Therapeutic studies (overview Table 4) also have a diagnostic component. The more efficient a specific therapy is the more likely is the confirmation of the suspected diagnosis. In functional disorders the greater the therapeutic effort particularly in experimental approaches the larger an expected placebo effect will be. Placebo effects of course also occur in organic diseases. They are however expected to be larger in functional disorders. Finally, this will not significantly help in the diagnostic process.

Table 4 Therapeutic methods evaluated to treat functional tremor

The influence of suggestibility on tremor amplitude, frequency or direction should be included in the clinical examination. In functional disorders cognitive behavioral therapy should be the first line treatment irrespective of the evidence of additional psychiatric symptoms [15].

Only 2 studies reviewing drug influence on functional tremor were found. These reviews discussed the usage of drugs on a low uncontrolled level. Randomized and blinded trials are not available.

A significant decrease of the Psychogenic Movement Disorder Rating Scale score could be detected after active but not sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at a rate of 1 Hz and an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold of the first dorsal interosseous or the tibialis anterior muscle. This effect still existed 12 months after the start of the invention. A relevant effect of hypnosis could not be shown [31] (HR).

In a single blinded study 33 patients with different functional movement disorders undergoing repeated low-frequency (0.25 Hz) magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex contralateral to the maximal symptom side or the spinal roots (RMS = root magnetic stimulation) on the symptom side showed a 66% symptom improvement both for RMS and TMS. The physicians who were rating the symptom severity were blinded to the stimulation technique. Apart from a placebo effect the authors discussed a cognitive-behavioral effect; they were skeptical concerning neuromodulation effect which is not to be expected at 0.25 Hz anyhow [13] (HR).

Symptoms of 24 patients with functional movement disorders were blindly video scored before and after a low frequency (0.25 Hz) TMS stimulation over the motor cortex contralateral to the symptoms. In 75% of the patients, the overall score improved more than 50% with a sustaining effect in a follow-up in median 19.8 months afterwards [14] (HR).

Dafotakis et al. tested 11 patients with functional tremor of the upper limb with a 0.2 Hz TMS protocol that applied 30 TMS pulses over the hand area of the primary motor cortex contralateral to the affected side documented by kinematic motion analysis. A significant reduction of tremor frequency could be documented in all patients. The authors conclude, that TMS might be an effective tool in the treatment of functional tremor, because the patients can have the expedience that the tremor also can stop, supporting the idea of a functional origin. In the context of all uncontrolled rTMS studies one might argue that the longer the aftereffects last the more a psychogenic pathogenesis might be assumed [9] (MR).

A typical clinical feature of functional tremor is the tremor entrainment in combination with or without the inability to perform simple cued movements with an unaffected body part. One study aimed to use this feature not only as a diagnostic but also as a therapeutic tool, in detail as a biofeedback treatment named ‘retrainment’. Biofeedback should teach patients the self-modulation of the tremor frequency as well as the severity of their tremor, eventually leading to volitional control of the movements of the affected body parts. Tremor entrainment was evaluated by tactile and auditory external cueing and real-time visual feedback on a computer screen. A short-term treatment was done of 2 hours, extended for up to two additional sessions until entrainment occurred. Of 10 patients with functional tremor, 3 patients had complete tremor freedom until the last follow-up visit after 6 months and a tremor improvement up to 6 months was seen in 6 patients, with 4 of them having relapses afterwards [11] (MR).

In addition to the validated and established cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) other psychiatric concepts have been explored in clinical trials. Two thirds of patients with functional movement disorders that underwent Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PDP) retrospectively showed some benefit. The aim of PDP is to explore potential underlying psychopathology and psychological conflicts which possibly show a connection to the neurological symptoms. This may help resolving the dysfunctional processes. Nevertheless, this treatment is time consuming and expensive and should be considered in some patients not responding to cognitive behavioral therapy which is the most standardized and evaluated kind of psychological treatment [12, 29] (HR/LR). This methods can be tentatively supplemented by relaxation techniques and physiotherapy [23] (LR), in particular in children and adolescents [18] (MR).

Case report

The differential diagnosis is outlined in the context of a patient with a strong disabling tremor raising the suspicion of a functional origin, but also with a history of a peripheral nerve trauma of the same limb, being mentioned as a possible cause of tremor as well [6]. A 48-year-old patient complained about a progressive tremor of the right arm (first occurrence August 2016) with the strongest expression in the right hand. Four years before the start of the tremor a giant cell tumor in the distal right radius had been surgically removed (December 2012), preceded by increasing chronic pain for a few months. Pain with varying severity continued over the years in the tumor area. Drug therapy resistance of the pain led to other procedures including a pain catheter implantation inducing a transient complete anesthesia of the right arm for several months. After multiple infiltrations the tremor occurred for the first time. In the further course repeated surgical procedures (including a cancellous bone replacement/implantation of foreign material, removing of a neurinoma), were carried out and a resection of the superficial ramus of the radial nerve was required because of scarred lesions (February 2018). A carpal tunnel syndrome was excluded (unremarkable findings in neurographies, August 2018.) In the immediate temporal context of this investigation the patient claimed a deterioration of the tremor existed since then all day.

At presentation the patient complained about persistent burning pain with a pronounced painful sensitivity to touch in the hand and forearm (fulfilling allodynia criteria) why she could hardly use her hand in all day activities. Tremor and pain increased significantly with tension or physical stress. No improvement of the tremor with alcohol and no family history of tremor was reported. Typical drug therapy attempts (pregabalin, gabapentin, tilidine, capsaicin in topical use in high dosages, increased to the tolerance level until side effects occurred) could not achieve full pain relief and had no influence on the tremor. Outpatient physiotherapy was carried out with a residual pain medication (transdermal buprenorphine 10 μ / h and naproxen 500 mg on demand up to 1000 mg/d).

The patient had a coarse high-amplitude, most likely middle-rate (about 4–6 / s) permanent tremor of the distal arm in the elbow joint with involvement of the proximal arm when elevated (Video Examination Part 1–4). Nevertheless, typical CRPS features such as sudomotor/vasomotor dysfunctions and motor and trophic signs were not evident [17, 30]. Further, laboratory diagnostics including copper and ceruloplasmin were normal.

By performing movements with the contralateral body side, the symptoms were distractible, further, movements of the contralateral arm showed co-activation of the hand with an increase in tremor intensity (Video Examination Part 1–4). Repeated painful surgery on the extremity would require the discussion of a Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), but the complete absence of trophic disturbances is incongruous. Case reports of tremor have been described but only after markable deafferentation not fitting well in this case [24]. There were no signs of bradykinesia and Parkinson’s syndrome, nor evidence of essential or enhanced physiological tremor. For resting as well as holding and action tremor and lack of connection to the orthostasis a dystonic tremor had been discussed, but analogical symptoms of the extremities and the rest of the body could not be found. The chronic pain and the resulting pronounced psychosocial stress were also considered as a cause or at least trigger. During an additional inpatient stay, neurophysiological recordings were carried out, which showed no abnormalities. Furthermore, a precise tremor analysis with determination of the amplitude and the constancy of the frequency was performed, including the examination of an entrainment sign with a decrease in the amplitude or irregularity under distraction or repetitive voluntary movement (Video Entrainment_Coactivation).

The patient stayed for 24 h in the Video-EEG Monitoring unit, including recording of the electrical activity of right arm muscles using surface electrodes, at that, an irregular tremor, mostly of the right hand, partially of the entire right arm was observed. It showed a relatively high frequency, with irregularities, at times combined with myoclonic jerks. A passive fixation of the hand led to an increase of the symptoms in the arm and in the shoulder. This phenomenon is described as “whack-a-mole” sign in patients with functional movement disorders (Video Entrainment_Coactivation) [24].

During the examination of the right arm, the movement disorder increased with a spontaneous swinging of the right arm (Video Examination Part 1–4). While performing activities of the left arm such as drinking from a cup or creaming the face the tremor stopped in the meantime. The right hand was used intermittently during activities, e.g. to spread butter on bread, as well as using a cosmetic item (Video Part 6/7 Eating). During sleep the tremor stopped completely and resumed after waking up. Overall, due to the irregular character, clearly situationally enhanced tremor and the clear suspension in distraction, a functional genesis of the movement disorder is assumed.

The patient had a long history of multiple surgical procedures, severe pain and associated mental distress. However, psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and panic disorder or depression were not documented. CRPS is a pain disorder affecting the limbs, which can be triggered by limb trauma either without (CRPS type I), or with a definable nerve lesion (CRPS type II). Patients complain about painful sensations, allodynia, hyperalgesia and usually show autonomic dysfunction like sudomotor disturbances and temperature changes. Further, this can be combined with motor dysfunction [17]. The radial nerve lesion, the multiple interventions, motoric dysfunctions as well as the severe pain could link to a CRPS. However, the autonomic dysfunctions were missing. Basal ganglia dysfunction is reported in complex regional pain syndrome, and clinical case series reported tremor in 16 up to 49% of CRPS-I patients [3]. Quantitative investigations of postural hand tremor in CRPS patients (reported in 57% of the cases) showed similarities with physiological tremor and concluded that tremor in CRPS is an enhanced form of this [10]. On the other hand, several clinical and neuroimaging studies pointed towards dysfunction of the basal ganglia in CRPS patients [3]. A recent MRI-study showed a bilateral decrease in gray matter density in the putamen of CRPS patients. Additionally higher levels of pain and motor impairment were associated with an increased functional connectivity between the putamen and the pre−/postcentral gyri [4]. Based on these results there was evidence of a pathophysiological involvement of the basal ganglia for the development of clinical motor symptoms in CRPS. Today, after 4 years, the patient continues to experience the described symptoms of tremor, pain and allodynia. The expression fluctuates between individual days.

Conclusion

In summary we think that the tremor in this patient is functional. Due to the distractibility of the tremor, intermittent good function and the whack a mole sign, a functional genesis is most likely. Unusual is the high level of symptoms throughout the day and in situations where the patient feels unobserved, the absence of tremor in sleep is however not differentiating. The pain and sensory disturbances make it difficult to examine and classify the symptoms. Due to this complex situation, a definitive classification of the tremor could be based on objective diagnostic criteria within the scope of full-time observation using Video-Monitoring and documentation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CRPS:

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

ET:

Essential tremor

FMD:

Functional movement disorder

FT:

Functional tremor

FTT:

Finger Tapping Test

PMD:

Psychogenic movement disorder

rCBF:

Relative cerebral blood flow

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

References

  1. 1.

    Alty, J. E., & Kempster, P. A. (2011). A practical guide to the differential diagnosis of tremor. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 87(1031), 623–629.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Apartis, E. (2014). Clinical neurophysiology of psychogenic movement disorders: How to diagnose psychogenic tremor and myoclonus. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 44(4), 417–424.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Azqueta-Gavaldon, M., Schulte-Gocking, H., Storz, C., Azad, S., Reiners, A., Borsook, D., et al. (2017). Basal ganglia dysfunction in complex regional pain syndrome - a valid hypothesis? European Journal of Pain, 21(3), 415–424.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Azqueta-Gavaldon, M., Youssef, A. M., Storz, C., Lemme, J., Schulte-Gocking, H., Becerra, L., et al. (2020). Implications of the putamen in pain and motor deficits in complex regional pain syndrome. Pain, 161(3), 595–608.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F., & Jankovic, J. (2020). Gender differences in functional movement disorders. Movement Disorder of Clinical Practice, 7(2), 182–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bhatia, K. P., Bain, P., Bajaj, N., Elble, R. J., Hallett, M., Louis, E. D., et al. (2018). Consensus statement on the classification of tremors. From the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 33(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Criswell, S., Sterling, C., Swisher, L., Evanoff, B., & Racette, B. A. (2010). Sensitivity and specificity of the finger tapping task for the detection of psychogenic movement disorders. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 16(3), 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Czarnecki, K., Jones, D. T., Burnett, M., Mullan, B., & Matsumoto, J. Y. (2011). SPECT perfusion patterns distinguish psychogenic from essential tremor. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 17(5), 328–332.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dafotakis, M., Ameli, M., Vitinius, F., Weber, R., Albus, C., Fink, G., et al. (2011). Transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychogenic tremor-a pilot study. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 79(4), 226–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Deuschl, G., Blumberg, H., & Lücking, C. H. (1991). Tremor in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Archives of Neurology, 48(12), 1247–1252.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Espay, A. J., Edwards, M. J., Oggioni, G. D., Phielipp, N., Cox, B., Gonzalez-Usigli, H., et al. (2014). Tremor retrainment as therapeutic strategy in psychogenic (functional) tremor. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 20(6), 647–650.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Espay, A. J., Ries, S., Maloney, T., Vannest, J., Neefus, E., Dwivedi, A. K., et al. (2019). Clinical and neural responses to cognitive behavioral therapy for functional tremor. Neurology, 93(19), e1787–e1e98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Garcin, B., Mesrati, F., Hubsch, C., Mauras, T., Iliescu, I., Naccache, L., et al. (2017). Impact of Transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional movement disorders: Cortical modulation or a behavioral effect? Frontiers in Neurology, 8, 338.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Garcin, B., Roze, E., Mesrati, F., Cognat, E., Fournier, E., Vidailhet, M., et al. (2013a). Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an efficient treatment for psychogenic movement disorders. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 84(9), 1043–1046.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goldstein, L. H., & Mellers, J. D. C. (2016). Psychologic treatment of functional neurologic disorders. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 139, 571–583.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hallett, M., Weiner, W. J., & Kompoliti, K. (2012). Psychogenic movement disorders. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 18, S155–S1S7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Harden, R. N., Bruehl, S., Perez, R. S., Birklein, F., Marinus, J., Maihofner, C., et al. (2010). Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest criteria") for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain, 150(2), 268–274.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harris, S. R. (2019). Psychogenic movement disorders in children and adolescents: An update. European Journal of Pediatrics, 178(4), 581–585.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hedera, P. (2012). Metabolic hyperactivity of the medial posterior parietal lobes in psychogenic tremor. In Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements (p. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kamble, N. L., & Pal, P. K. (2016). Electrophysiological evaluation of psychogenic movement disorders. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 22(Suppl 1), S153–S158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kramer, G., Van der Stouwe, A. M. M., Maurits, N. M., Tijssen, M. A. J., & Elting, J. W. J. (2018). Wavelet coherence analysis: A new approach to distinguish organic and functional tremor types. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 129(1), 13–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Macerollo, A., Chen, J. C., Pareés, I., Kassavetis, P., Kilner, J. M., & Edwards, M. J. (2015). Sensory attenuation assessed by sensory evoked potentials in functional movement disorders. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Morgante, F., Edwards, M. J., & Espay, A. J. (2013). Psychogenic movement disorders. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology, 19(5 Movement Disorders), 1383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Osumi, M., Sumitani, M., Kumagaya, S. I., & Morioka, S. (2017). Optimal control of reaching is disturbed in complex regional pain syndrome: A single-case study. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 167–173.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Regragui, W., Lachhab, L., Razine, R., Ait Benhaddou, E. H., Benomar, A., & Yahyaoui, M. (2014). A clinical study of non-parkinsonian tremor in Moroccan patients. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 170(1), 26–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schwingenschuh, P., Katschnig, P., Seiler, S., Saifee, T. A., Aguirregomozcorta, M., Cordivari, C., et al. (2011). Moving toward "laboratory-supported" criteria for psychogenic tremor. Movement Disorders, 26(14), 2509–2515.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schwingenschuh, P., Saifee, T. A., Katschnig-Winter, P., Macerollo, A., Koegl-Wallner, M., Culea, V., et al. (2016a). Validation of "laboratory-supported" criteria for functional (psychogenic) tremor. Movement Disorders, 31(4), 555–562.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., et al. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 350, g7647.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sharma, V. D., Jones, R., & Factor, S. A. (2017a). Psychodynamic psychotherapy for functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Journal of Movement Disorder, 10(1), 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shim, H., Rose, J., Halle, S., & Shekane, P. (2019). Complex regional pain syndrome: A narrative review for the practising clinician. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 123(2), e424–ee33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Taib, S., Ory-Magne, F., Brefel-Courbon, C., Moreau, Y., Thalamas, C., Arbus, C., et al. (2019a). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for functional tremor: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Movement Disorders, 34(8), 1210–1219.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    van der Stouwe, A. M., Conway, B. A., Elting, J. W., Tijssen, M. A., & Maurits, N. M. (2015). Usefulness of intermuscular coherence and cumulant analysis in the diagnosis of postural tremor. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(8), 1564–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    van Rooijen, D. E., Geraedts, E. J., Marinus, J., Jankovic, J., & van Hilten, J. J. (2011). Peripheral trauma and movement disorders: A systematic review of reported cases. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 82(8), 892–898.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patient for the support and the possibility to publish the case report. Further, we thank Elisabeth Yoshida-Stiksrud, MD for performing the neurological examinations during the inpatient stay. Dr. Hallett is supported by the NINDS Intramural Program.

Funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MB and WP were responsible for the conception and design of work. MB and RK were responsible for the acquisition of data. MB, RK and WP were responsible for the analysis of data. MB, RK, MH, MT and WP were responsible for the interpretation of data. MB, RK, MH, MT and WP were responsible for drafting the paper. MB, RK, MH, MT and WP were responsible for critically revising the paper for important intellectual content. The authors approved the submitted version (and any substantially modified version that involves the author’s contribution to the study) and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bartl.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No experiments on humans or animals were carried out for this study. The data were all collected from previously published studies.

Consent for publication

In regard of the case report a consent of publication from the patient was obtained in advanced.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Part 1 Examination.

Additional file 2:

Part 2 Examination.

Additional file 3:

Part 3 Examination.

Additional file 4:

Part 4 Examination.

Additional file 5:

Part 5. Reading.

Additional file 6:

Part 6. Eating.

Additional file 7:

Part 7. Eating.

Additional file 8:

Entrainment_Coactivation.

Additional file 9.

Supplementary material.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartl, M., Kewitsch, R., Hallett, M. et al. Diagnosis and therapy of functional tremor a systematic review illustrated by a case report. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00073-1

Download citation