Long-term benefit of pallidal deep brain stimulation in a patient with VPS16-associated dystonia
Neurological Research and Practice volume 4, Article number: 21 (2022)
Here, we report a patient with segmental dystonia harboring a heterozygous pathogenic variant in VPS16 who underwent pallidal deep brain stimulation with sustained tremendous benefit over a follow-up period of 3 years.
A 43-year-old patient presented with segmental dystonia beginning with mild writer’s cramp of the right hand at the age of 33 years. At the age of 40 years, he first recognized a torticollis to the left. The severity of cervical dystonia progressed over the years, while writer’s cramp remained mild but disabling. Further medical and family history was unremarkable. The patient has two healthy children.
On physical examination we observed a retrocaput and torticollis to the left of variable severity. There was no limitation in head movements. Writing with the right hand induced a mild writer’s cramp. The patient was able to suppress cervical dystonia by a “geste antagoniste”, specifically by light touch of his chin with his fingers. Additionally, the patient reported light improvement of dystonic symptoms by alcohol consumption. (Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale—Movement Scale (BFMDRS): 16 points, Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale—Torticollis Severity Scale (TWSTRS-I): 16 points,—Disability Scale (TWSTRS-II): 13 points,—Pain Scale (TWSTRS-III): 5 points). Furthermore, the patient suffered of mild to moderate anxiety and depression. As per clinical routine, the patient underwent psychiatric evaluation prior to deep brain stimulation, determining these non-motor symptoms as reactive to his dystonic symptom burden. Neuropsychiatric examination showed mild mnestic (PANDA 23/30 points) but no cognitive impairment. Laboratory examination was not suspicious for any secondary cause of dystonia. Exome sequencing identified a heterozygous predicted loss of function variant (pLoF) in the canonical sequence of VPS16 ((ENST00000380445.3 (NM_022575.3)): c.1903C > T, p.Arg635Ter). This variant is listed once in the gnomAD browsers (gnomad.broadinstitute.org) in a heterozygous state (age not given). However, it has also been identified in an independent, similarly affected patient, and is predicted to be deleterious by the CADD pathogenicity predictor (CADD score 37, https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/) . Other heterozygous pLoFs have been reported to cause dystonia as well, and case–control studies have shown significant enrichment of pLoFs in dystonia patients [1, 2]. Thus, we classified the variant as pathogenic according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG class 5; PVS1, PS1, PS4) . Family members of our patient were not available for additional segregation analysis.
The patient only poorly responded to trihexyphenidyl and botulinum toxin and therefore underwent pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) after exclusion of any contraindications and evaluation of the case in our interdisciplinary expert board. Dystonic symptoms including writer’s cramp and non-motor symptoms improved tremendously under DBS with a sustained response over three years without any additional medication needed (see Additional file 1, 3-year follow-up: BFMDRS: 1 point TWSTRS-I: 0 points, TWSTRS-II: 1 point, TWSTRS-III: 4 points). There were no stimulation-induced side-effects reported. The lead position is illustrated in Fig. 1.
VPS16 encodes vacuolar protein sorting associated protein 16, a key component of the two tethering protein complexes CORVET (class C core vacuole/endosome tethering) and HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting). The link between malfunction of these protein complexes causing defective endosomal maturation and/or lysosomal dysfunctions and inherited dystonia has also been described in VPS41 and VPS11 mutations, leading to the subsummation as HOPS-associated neurological disorders (HOPSANDs) [2, 4]. In 2016, Cai et al. were the first to report a homozygous missense variant (c.156C > A, p.Asn52Lys) in VPS16 in a consanguineous family with adolescent-onset dystonia and five affected family members. In addition, they were able to reproduce the observed phenotype-genotype correlation in a mouse-model . In 2020, Steel et al. reported 18 cases with heterozygous pLoFs and one case with a microdeletion spanning VPS16 . Recently, Park et al. were able to demonstrate that pLoFs in VPS16 associated with dystonia were in the same highly expressed canonical transcript (ENST00000380445.3 (NM_022575.3)) . Regarding the pattern of inheritance, a dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance but also de novo occurrence has been reported [2, 6].
Overall, 26 affected individuals with heterozygous pLoFs in VPS16 have been reported so far [2, 5,6,7,8]. The prevalence in early onset dystonia has been estimated to 0.9 to 4% [2, 6]. Most of the patients presenting with segmental dystonia comprised writer’s cramp and cervical, oromandibular or limb dystonia with a median age at onset of 12 years (range: 3–50 years), and progression over the years. Additional features reported are mild to moderate intellectual disability (~ 20%), neuropsychiatric symptoms (~ 30%) seizures (< 10%), and only in single cases other movement disorders such as myoclonic jerks [1, 2, 6]. In some patients, symptom relief was observed with Levodopa (4/26), whereas trihexyphenidyl was effective in only one patient. Botulinum toxin was successfully used in 8/26 patients, especially to treat cervical dystonia. Including the present case, 7 patients were reported to receive pallidal DBS so far. While four of them showed significant symptom improvement one patient did only partly benefit and two patients did not benefit from the intervention. Besides the sustained treatment effect over 3 years, as reported here, only one other patient has been reported regarding longtime follow-up with a sustained treatment effect over 7 years [2, 6]. While no distinct pattern of dystonic symptoms of patients not responding to DBS could be identified from the literature, DBS non-responder seem to have a younger age at onset (3, 7 and 10 years), than patients responding well to DBS (age at onset: 11, 16, 19, 33 years). This dependency of treatment response on age at onset has also been reported for other monogenic dystonias, in terms of worse motor outcomes with older age at onset in DYT-TOR1A and younger age at onset in DYT-SGCE .
To conclude, this case report demonstrates sustained response to pallidal DBS in rare VPS16-associated dystonia, and adds to individualized counseling of patients with dystonia prior to DBS surgery.
Deep brain stimulation
Torticollis Rating Scale
Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dstonia Rating Scale
Park, J., Reilaender, A., Petry-Schmelzer, J. N., et al. (2022). Transcript-specific loss-of-function variants in VPS16 are enriched in patients with dystonia. Neurology: Genetics, 8(1), e644.
Steel, D., Zech, M., Zhao, C., et al. (2020). Loss-of-function variants in HOPS complex genes VPS16 and VPS41 cause early onset dystonia associated with lysosomal abnormalities. Annals of Neurology, 88(5), 867–877.
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., et al. (2015). Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genetics in Medicine, 17(5), 405–423.
Monfrini, E., Zech, M., Steel, D., et al. (2021). HOPS-associated neurological disorders (HOPSANDs): Linking endolysosomal dysfunction to the pathogenesis of dystonia. Brain, 144(9), 2610–2615.
Cai, X., Chen, X., Wu, S., et al. (2016). Homozygous mutation of VPS16 gene is responsible for an autosomal recessive adolescent-onset primary dystonia. Science and Reports, 6, 25834.
Pott, H., Brüggemann, N., Reese, R., et al. (2021). Truncating VPS16 mutations are rare in early onset dystonia. Annals of Neurology, 89(3), 625–626.
Li, L.-X., Jiang, L.-T., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Mutation screening of VPS16 gene in patients with isolated dystonia. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 83, 63–65.
Li, X.-Y., Wang, L., Guo, Y., & Wan, X.-H. (2021). Mutations in the VPS16 gene in 56 early-onset dystonia patients. Movement Disorders, 36(3), 780–781.
Artusi, C. A., Dwivedi, A., Romagnolo, A., et al. (2020). Differential response to pallidal deep brain stimulation among monogenic dystonias: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 91(4), 426–433.
Horn, A., Li, N., Dembek, T. A., et al. (2019). Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. NeuroImage, 184, 293–316.
Ewert, S., Plettig, P., Li, N., et al. (2018). Toward defining deep brain stimulation targets in MNI space: A subcortical atlas based on multimodal MRI, histology and structural connectivity. NeuroImage, 170, 271–282.
The authors thank the patient for his consent to publish his case.
Supported by the Cologne Clinician Scientist Program (CCSP)/ Faculty of Medicine/ University of Cologne. Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG FI 773/15-1) to JPS.
Ethical Approval and Consent to participate
The authors confirm that the approval of an institutional review board was not required for this work and that the work was conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
The patient gave written informed consent for video documentation and online publication.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional file 1: Video 1. Response to pallidal deep brain stimulation. Preoperatively the patient presented with cervical dystonia and writer’s cramp on the right. After pallidal DBS the patient improved tremendously with sustained benefit over three years.
About this article
Cite this article
Petry-Schmelzer, J.N., Park, J., Haack, T.B. et al. Long-term benefit of pallidal deep brain stimulation in a patient with VPS16-associated dystonia. Neurol. Res. Pract. 4, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00185-w