Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of vascular risk profile and clinical outcomes among patients with central (branch) retinal artery occlusion versus amaurosis fugax

Neurological Research and Practice volume 6, Article number: 27 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Retinal artery occlusions lead to sudden, painless vision loss, affecting millions globally. Despite their significance, treatment strategies remain unestablished, contrasting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), where IVT has proven efficacy. Similar to AIS, retinal artery occlusions demand urgent evaluation and treatment, reflecting the principle "time is retina". Even for patients with transient monocular vision loss, also known as amaurosis fugax (AF), pertinent guidelines meanwhile recommend immediate emergency assessment in a specialized facility. However, data on the clinical benefit and comparability with persistent occlusions are missing. This study aimed to compare the results of a comprehensive stroke-workup among patients with persistent retinal artery occlusions (RAO), including both central retinal (CRAO) and branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) and those with AF.

Methods

Conducted at the University Hospital Giessen, Germany, this exploratory cross-sectional study enrolled patients with transient or permanent unilateral vision loss of non-arteritic origin. The primary outcome were differences between the two groups RAO and AF with regard to cardiovascular risk profiles and comorbidities, vascular and pharmacological interventions and clinical neurological and ophthalmological outcomes. Secondary outcome was a sub-group analysis of patients receiving IVT.

Results

Out of 166 patients assessed, 76 with RAO and 40 with AF met the inclusion criteria. Both groups exhibited comparable age, gender distribution, and cardiovascular risk profiles. Notably, RAO patients did not show significantly more severe vascular comorbidities than AF patients. However, AF patients received vascular interventions more frequently. Pharmacological intervention rates were similar across groups. RAO patients had slightly worse neurological outcomes, and IVT did not yield favorable ophthalmological outcomes within any observed patients.

Conclusion

The study found similar vascular burden and risk factors in patients with RAO and AF, with implications for clinical workflows. IVT for RAO may only be effective in very early treatment windows. This emphasizes the need for public awareness and collaborative protocols between ophthalmologists and neurologists to improve outcomes.

Background

Retinal artery occlusions are diseases affecting the central retinal artery (CRAO), or branches respectively (i.e. BRAO), and lead to a painless, sudden, usually unilateral irreversible severe vision loss or, in the case of BRAO, partial loss of visual field [17]. Incidence of RAO is age-dependent ranging between 2.7–4.5/100,000 people with a steep increase up to 57/100,000 in patients above 80 years [34]. Main causes of CRAO and BRAO, in the following summarized as retinal artery occlusions (RAO), include thrombo-embolism caused by carotid plaques or atrial fibrillation. The EAGLE study revealed elevated cardiovascular risk factors including obesity, hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes as well as cardiac arrhythmia in up to 20% of patients with RAO [16, 38]. Contrary to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in which intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is considered to be a first line therapeutic approach, there are up to now no established proven treatment strategies for RAO [32]. In spite of local and systemic treatment modalities, the prognosis regarding recovery of vision is quite unfavorable with a majority of patients improving only little or not at all [17]. However, the new surgical and laser assisted approaches show promising anatomic and functional results when applied on time [27]. Nevertheless, there is a call for action to prioritize these patients like strokes as neurological emergencies [15, 36].

These permanent monocular vision losses are distinguished from those with transient monocular vision losses of vascular origin, i.e. amaurosis fugax (AF). AF may occur both because of thromboembolism or due to retinal hypoperfusion on the basis of proximal extracranial perfusion deficits, and is associated with increased risk for subsequent stroke [12]. In simple terms, RAO can be considered the ophthalmological equivalent of AIS, while AF represents the ophthalmological equivalent of a transient ischemic attack (TIA), as stated by the American Heart Association [14].

In both diseases, the likelihood of concomitant and subsequent cerebral ischemia is increased [33], why available guidelines suggest to consider both, AF and RAO, as neurological emergencies, i.e. “time is retina”, with immediate presentation to an (neurological) emergency department (ED) to timely realize neuroimaging and eventually IVT [9, 13, 36, 39]. The presentation of RAO- and AF-patients is often delayed due to an initial presentation to the ophthalmologist, which undermines these recommendations in clinical reality [39].

For AIS and TIA, there is some limited data that suggests that patients may differ in their risk profiles, and that patients with TIA tend to be younger and to suffer from a lower prevalence of vascular risk factors such as peripheral arteriopathy [22, 42]. In contrast, only few data exist regarding the vascular risk profile among patients with RAO versus AF. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare cardiovascular risk profiles and comorbidities among patients with RAO and AF, and thus to substantiate the demand on an immediate presentation in the ED. Further, we a priori decided, to sub-analyze time windows and clinical outcomes among the subgroup of patients with RAO receiving IVT.

Methods

Study design, study population and clinical parameters

We performed an exploratory cross-sectional study at the tertiary care center of the University Hospital Giessen, Germany. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board (Giessen Stroke Registry: GIST. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05295862). GIST is a registry in which all patients with cerebral strokes but also patients with retinal ischemia treated at the University Hospital Giessen are consecutively included. Over a two-year period, data on all consecutive patients with symptoms of transient or permanent unilateral vision loss of non-arteritic origin were entered into an observational database. Patient characteristics, CRAO-/BRAO- and AF-specific information, and medications were recorded. Patients whose visual loss was caused by an anterior or posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION/PION) were excluded. We enrolled all patients with persistent (CRAO/BRAO) or transient (AF) vision loss for analysis. The variables collected for the two patient groups included socio-demographic characteristics, parameters on cardiovascular risk profile and comorbidities, according to established criteria [2, 6, 11, 30, 37, 44], clinical and radiological data and results of ophthalmological and neurological examinations. While the data collection itself was thus prospective, the development of the analyses described here, i.e. the selection of variables and the compilation of an evaluation plan, only took place after the data collection and was therefore retrospective.

Ophthalmological and neurological outcomes

For grading of vision loss we used International Classification of Diseases 11th edition criteria, as suggested by WHO. Neurological impairment was obtained according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and neurological outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge. Furthermore, data on imaging and neurovascular diagnostics as well as treatment data, i.e. surgery or invasive interventions, and mode and intensity of pharmacological secondary prophylaxis were assessed.

Ultrasound workup

Three types of ultrasound examinations were performed on the study population including carotid ultrasound and transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) in all patients, as well as transocular ultrasound in RAO patients. Outcomes were: Evidence of atherosclerosis, ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis ≥ 50%, spot sign, patent foramen ovale (PFO) and the ejection fraction (EF) [3, 19], North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy [31].

Endpoints

Endpoints consisted of: Analysis of (i) vascular interventions (defined as either ICA stenting or carotid endarterectomy (CEA)), (ii) pharmacological interventions (defined as either no change on antithrombotic medication vs. intensification, the latter reflecting initiation of antithrombotic treatment in naive patients, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in previously acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) monotherapy patients or initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC; direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin)), as well as (iii) neurological clinical outcome at discharge (NIHSS and mRS). We assessed (iv) ophthalmological outcome after IVT in the sub-group analysis of patients with CRAO/BRAO.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize data on clinical characteristics, stroke work-up and procedural outcomes of the two patient populations. These statistics included means, standard deviations (SD) and range for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. To assess the normality of the distribution of continuous variables, the Shapiro–Wilk test was applied. Normally distributed data were presented by mean (SD) and compared using two-sided t-tests, non-normally distributed data were presented by median (range) and compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The significance level was set at alpha = 0.05 with a statistical trending in cases of < 0.1. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, and Fisher's Exact Test, respectively. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 29.0 (www.spss.com).

Results

Participants

A total of 166 patients presented to the ED with symptoms of unilateral vision loss during the defined study period and were therefore assessed for eligibility. Patients whose symptoms were attributable to AION (n = 46) or PION (n = 4) were excluded. Of the remaining patients, 76 patients met the diagnostic criteria for permanent (CRAO/BRAO) and 40 patients for transient (AF) retinal arterial occlusion (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

STROBE flow diagram of study participants

Full size image

Baseline clinical data

Table 1 shows the baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The RAO and AF groups had a comparable distribution of age, gender and affected sides. Based on the TOAST criteria [1], there was no significant difference in the distribution of etiology among both groups. In general, patients with RAO showed a tendency towards a higher cardiovascular risk profile and correspondingly a higher use of respective premedication. The proportion of patients with antithrombotic therapy or intake of OAC was not significantly different among both groups, as were the majority of laboratory parameters on admission (Table 2).

Table 1 Demographics and baseline clinical data
Full size table
Table 2 Comorbidities and baseline laboratory results
Full size table

Key findings in disadvantage of RAO, as compared to AF, were a significantly elevated baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) value (12.6 vs 3.3 mg/L) and, as per definition, ophthalmological and neurological deficits an admission. Both groups had similar pre-existing mRS-scores. The majority of patients with RAO (57 (75%)) presented later than 4.5 h after symptom onset. Among the patients with AF, about half (17 (42.5%)) had a symptom duration of less than 5 min. Within the RAO group, 46 (62%) patients met the WHO criteria for blindness in the affected eye [7].

Vascular diagnostics

Both patient groups received a comparable workup and thus the same vascular diagnostics. Transocular ultrasound was performed in 51 (67%) patients of the RAO group with a spot sign evident in 15 (29.4%) patients. Regarding carotid ultrasound we observed a trend towards higher amount of atherosclerosis in RAO patients (95.8% vs. 83.8%), while AF-patients showed an ipsilateral ICA stenosis ≥ 50% (26.3% vs. 12.3%) more frequently. Cardiac workup revealed no differences between RAO versus AF with respect to mode of sonography (TTE/TEE), incidence of PFO (14% vs. 40%), and EF (mean: 57 vs. 56%).

Rates of vascular intervention, antithrombotic medication and neurological outcome

Table 3 summarizes the results of the interventions performed, and secondary prophylactic measures initiated, during the period of hospitalization. Compared to RAO, patients with AF received significantly more vascular interventions (4 (5.3%) vs. 7 (17.5%); p < 0.05). Regarding pharmacological interventions, intensification in medication was not significantly different among both groups (46/76 vs. 29/40). There was no signal among the sub-group analysis of patients with platelet inhibitors versus OAC for imbalances in favor or against of any of the studied groups. There was a significant difference in the median mRS Score to the disadvantage of patients with RAO (1 (0–1) vs. 0 (0–0); Table 3).

Table 3 Treatment and outcome
Full size table

Subgroup analysis of patients with RAO who received IVT

A total of 18 patients (24%) with RAO received IVT within a median door to needle time of 52 min. Only 8 patients presented within the approved time-window for IVT. Regarding the analysis of ophthalmological follow-up (Table 4), visual acuity improved in 5 patients, worsened in 2 and remained unchanged in 9. In all 5 cases, however, the improvement was limited to an improvement of only a single point within the blindness category. Thus, no clinically relevant improvement was observed for any patient. Regarding timing (< 4.5 h vs. 4.5–12 h) of IVT in relation to ophthalmological outcome we did not detect significant differences.

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of patients with RAO who received IVT
Full size table

Discussion

This comparative study demonstrated that (i) RAO patients did not show more severe vascular comorbidities, while (ii) AF patients received vascular interventions significantly more often. Regarding (iii) pharmacological intensification there was no difference among both groups. (iv) Clinical neurological outcome was slightly worse in RAO patients. Finally, (v) IVT, irrespective of time window applied, did not lead to favorable ophthalmological outcomes in any of our patients. Three aspects emerge from the data.

First, both RAO and AF patients showed a similar vascular risk factor and comorbidity profile. This is an interesting finding in light of the discussion that both diseases may represent the ophthalmological TIA, or AIS, respectively [9]. In our study, patients with permanent and transient retinal artery occlusion were approximately the same age, had similar preexisting comorbidities, and had a similar cardiovascular risk profile. While the aspect of a certain vascular burden has been demonstrated previously for RAO patients [10, 25], the lacking imbalances of vascular burden compared to AF contrasts pertinent literature on cerebral ischemia. On the one hand, several reports verified that patients with TIA are younger and have fewer comorbidities than those with infarction [42]. On the other hand, however, risk for recurrent stroke is increased among both RAO and AF, which is in line to the situation in TIA and AIS [4, 12]. Thus, in light of a high chance of dealing with the same patient population in RAO and AF, both patient groups should be considered in the same way as TIA and AIS. This fact harbors clinical implications for daily clinical routine such as, that patients with RAO and AF should undergo the same dedicated diagnostic workup and potential management on a stroke unit. This however, at least for the group of RAO patients, is not established everywhere, as there are countries including Germany, in which RAO patients are often treated as out-patients. Stroke units not only allow rapid assessment but are also designed to cover early rehabilitation and monitoring for early recurrent strokes [24]. While patients with RAO and AF are less likely to benefit from the early rehabilitation capacity, a rapid assessment certainly seems appropriate. However, the structured and immediate work-up would not necessarily have to take place on a stroke unit. In principle, this could also be performed by peripheral units with a lower level of care and the appropriate expertise, in order to avoid unnecessary overloading of stroke units.

Of note, the different CRP levels on admission suit well into the ongoing debate of an underlying pro-inflammatory process as a contributing factor for stroke ictus [23]. In patients with AIS it has been established previously that elevated CRP levels on admission are related to poorer long term prognosis including all-cause mortality [45]. Future studies should focus on long-term clinical course of patients with RAO at a similar intensity as it is done currently in AIS patients [28, 29].

Second, regarding IVT in RAO, we did not observe any clinical benefit in any of the patients treated with IVT. This aspect is different to those patients who receive IVT in case of AIS, of whom a substantial proportion shows clinical improvement and thrombus resolution [43]. Studies suggest early thrombolysis for patients with RAO in order to increase the chance of revascularization of retinal vessels and thus the prevention of irreversible loss of vision [26], which is why this procedure is recommended by guidelines [13, 28, 29]. However, according to a Cochrane Review, there is a lack of high-level evidence to support this claim [18]. Regarding time-window for IVT, it was hypothesized to be possibly shorter in retinal ischemia compared to AIS [40]. While the postulated threshold of 4.5 h after symptom onset has extensive scientific support for patients with AIS, its relevance for patients with RAO is based on only a single animal study in 5 rhesus monkeys [21]. In AIS, there is a certain collateral flow in the penumbra of ischemic core of the cerebral infarction keeping neurons and Central-Nervous-System tissue salvageable for hours [8]. Although there seem to be similar retinal penumbra models and there might be significant inter-individual differences in retinal tolerance to ischemia [28, 29], the retinal ganglion cells that form the optic nerve appear to undergo apoptosis already after only 12–15 min [40]. Up to now, there have been no published results of the randomized IVT-trials in CRAO currently recruiting (NCT03197194, NCT04965038) why our understanding of time-windows in RAO will improve based on these data.

Third, in RAO there might be a substantial underreporting of transient vision losses given the benign course of disease [15]. This holds true for both AF-patients, but also to a significant amount in patients with CRAO/BRAO, notably in those who experience visual acuity improvement after minutes due to spontaneous recanalization or the presence of cilioretinal sparing [20]. These aspects require efforts to adopt heath and emergency care systems in various countries, including Germany. The lack of awareness of these diseases in the general population is reflected by a high number of patients in ophthalmological ED not being aware of the existence of these conditions [41]. There should be a significant escalation of public relations work in order to encourage people with transient vision loss to immediately seek emergency evaluation to verify or exclude RAO or AF. According to recent evidence, only a maximum of half of RAO patients regularly present to the ED within a time window for IVT [39]. Further, the typical patients´ contact with their ophthalmologists in this setting is not ideal, as it is associated with significant time delay for possible IVT.

Instead, emergency physicians, covering both neurological and ophthalmological expertise in the same ED, should handle both RAO as well as AF-patients. In addition, the respective professional neurological and ophthalmological societies should consent on a joint protocol for acute management of these patients including diagnostic workup by ophthalmologists paralleled by IVT-treatment by neurologists in order to save time and recruit more patients to the “golden hour”. These efforts should certainly result in an increased proportion of patients with correct diagnosis of RAO including an accelerated diagnostic and therapeutic workflow leading to more favorable clinical outcomes [9].

Our study has certain limitations, notably its monocentric and retrospective design that undermines the generalizability of our findings to other cohorts. Whilst it can be assumed that most patients with a persistent RAO receive a neurological examination at some point during the course of their disease, only an unknown proportion of patients with AF will probably ever be seen by an ophthalmologist or neurologist, due to the transient nature of their symptoms, similarly to TIA-patients [5]. Further, the etiology of AF should also be discussed. This study included patients whose symptoms were suspected to be due to underlying vascular disease, and therefore rapid vascular diagnostics seemed appropriate. Thus, the diagnosis of AF was based on the report of a sudden, painless, unilateral, and transient loss of vision with an attack duration of less than 24 h. However, as with TIA, there is a possibility that these symptoms may have been caused and mimicked by other diseases [35]. These considerations emphasize the need for better stratification of patients with transient monocular vision loss in the future. Another limitation is that only mRS scores were documented to assess patients' disability status. This measure is not ideal for stroke patients with isolated vision loss and was therefore not sensitive to differences during the course of hospitalization or between the two groups of patients. However, the mRS results indicated that both groups of patients generally had a low level of impairment in daily activities at both admission and discharge. This supports the assumption that patients with RAO or AF generally present with a low degree of neurological pre-injury and remain minimally impaired in the short term, i.e., within their inpatient stay.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study verified similar vascular burden and risk factors in RAO- and AF-patients with implications for clinical and diagnostic workflows respectively. Further, IVT in RAO appears to be ineffective if not applied within very early time windows. These aspects should result in public relations work to increase awareness of RAO and AF as medical emergencies, and in a call for action to establish joint protocols of ophthalmologists and neurologists to improve clinical outcome.

Availability of data and materials

Requests for access to the data reported in this paper will be considered by the lead authors (NJD, HBH) depending on the terms of our regulatory approvals and institutional policies of individual study frame-works.

Abbreviations

RAO:

Retinal artery occlusion

CRAO:

Central retinal artery occlusion

BRAO:

Branch retinal artery occlusion

AIS:

Acute ischemic stroke

IVT:

Intravenous thrombolysis

AF:

Amaurosis fugax

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

ED:

Emergency department

A/PION:

Anterior/posterior ischemic optic neuropathy

WHO:

World Health Organization

NIHSS:

National Institute of Health Stroke Scale

mRS:

Modified Rankin Scale

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiography

PFO:

Patent foramen ovale

EF:

Ejection fraction

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

CEA:

Carotid endarterectomy

DAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

ASA:

Acetylsalicylic acid

OAC:

Oral anticoagulation

SD:

Standard deviation

TOAST:

Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment

CRP:

C-reactive protein

References

  1. Adams, H.P., Jr., Bendixen, B.H., Kappelle, L.J., Biller, J., Love, B.B., Gordon, D.L., Marsh, E.E., 3rd. (1993). Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke, 24(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.1.35

  2. Alberti, K.G., Zimmet, P., Shaw, J., Group, I. D. F. E. T. F. C. (2005). The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet, 366(9491), 1059–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altmann, M., Ertl, M., Helbig, H., Schomig, B., Bogdahn, U., Gamulescu, M. A., & Schlachetzki, F. (2015). Low endogenous recanalization in embolic central retinal artery occlusion–the retrobulbar “spot sign.” Journal of Neuroimaging, 25(2), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amarenco, P., Lavallee, P. C., Monteiro Tavares, L., Labreuche, J., Albers, G. W., Abboud, H., Anticoli, S., Audebert, H., Bornstein, N. M., Caplan, L. R., Correia, M., Donnan, G. A., Ferro, J. M., Gongora-Rivera, F., Heide, W., Hennerici, M. G., Kelly, P. J., Kral, M., Lin, H. F., … o. (2018). Five-Year Risk of Stroke after TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(23), 2182–2190. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amin, H.P., Madsen, T.E., Bravata, D.M., Wira, C.R., Johnston, S.C., Ashcraft, S., Burrus, T.M., Panagos, P.D., Wintermark, M., Esenwa, C., American Heart Association Emergency Neurovascular Care Committee of the Stroke, C., Council on Peripheral Vascular, D. (2023). Diagnosis, Workup, Risk Reduction of Transient Ischemic Attack in the Emergency Department Setting: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Stroke, 54(3), e109–e121. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrade, J.G., Aguilar, M., Atzema, C., Bell, A., Cairns, J.A., Cheung, C.C., Cox, J.L., Dorian, P., Gladstone, D.J., Healey, J.S., Khairy, P., Leblanc, K., McMurtry, M.S., Mitchell, L.B., Nair, G.M., Nattel, S., Parkash, R., Pilote, L., Sandhu, R.K., Members of the Secondary, P. (2020). The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 36(12), 1847–1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Association, W. H. (2018). International classification of diseases 11th revision (ICD-11). World Health Organization.

  8. Astrup, J., Siesjo, B. K., & Symon, L. (1981). Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra. Stroke, 12(6), 723–725. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.12.6.723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biousse, V., Nahab, F., & Newman, N. J. (2018). Management of Acute Retinal Ischemia: Follow the Guidelines! Ophthalmology, 125(10), 1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Callizo, J., Feltgen, N., Pantenburg, S., Wolf, A., Neubauer, A.S., Jurklies, B., Wachter, R., Schmoor, C., Schumacher, M., Junker, B., Pielen, A., European Assessment Group for Lysis in the, E. (2015). Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Results of a Prospective and Standardized Medical Examination. Ophthalmology, 122(9), 1881–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, J., & Aronowitz, P. (2022). Congestive Heart Failure. Medical Clinics of North America, 106(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2021.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, T. Y., Uppuluri, A., Aftab, O., Zarbin, M., Agi, N., & Bhagat, N. (2024). Risk factors for ischemic cerebral stroke in patients with acute amaurosis fugax. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 59(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsche Ophthalmologische, G., Retinologische Gesellschaft e. , V., Berufsverband der Augenarzte Deutschlands e. , V. (2023). [Retinal arterial occlusions (RAV) : S2e guidelines of the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG), the German Retina Society (RG) and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA). Version: 7 October 2022]. Ophthalmologie, 120(Suppl 1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-022-01780-7 (Retinale arterielle Verschlusse (RAV) : S2e-Leitlinie der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft (DOG), der Retinologischen Gesellschaft (RG), des Berufsverbands der Augenarzte Deutschlands (BVA). Aktualisierte Version vom 07.10.2022.)

  14. Easton, J.D., Saver, J.L., Albers, G.W., Alberts, M.J., Chaturvedi, S., Feldmann, E., Hatsukami, T.S., Higashida, R.T., Johnston, S.C., Kidwell, C.S., Lutsep, H. L., Miller, E., Sacco, R.L., American Heart, A., American Stroke Association Stroke, C., Council on Cardiovascular, S., Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular, R., Intervention, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular, D. (2009). Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke, 40(6):2276–2293. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192218

  15. Fallico, M., Lotery, A. J., Longo, A., Avitabile, T., Bonfiglio, V., Russo, A., Murabito, P., Palmucci, S., Pulvirenti, A., & Reibaldi, M. (2020). Risk of acute stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye (London, England), 34(4), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0576-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feltgen, N., Neubauer, A., Jurklies, B., Schmoor, C., Schmidt, D., Wanke, J., Maier-Lenz, H., Schumacher, M., Group, E. A.-S. (2006). Multicenter study of the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye (EAGLE) for the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion: design issues and implications. EAGLE Study report no. 1 : EAGLE Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 244(8):950–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0140-2

  17. Feltgen, N., & Pielen, A. (2017). Retinal artery occlusion. Der Ophthalmologe, 114(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-016-0432-4(RetinalerArterienverschluss.)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraser, S., Siriwardena, D. (2002). Interventions for acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (1):CD001989. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001989

  19. Hahn, R. T., Abraham, T., Adams, M. S., Bruce, C. J., Glas, K. E., Lang, R. M., Reeves, S. T., Shanewise, J. S., Siu, S. C., Stewart, W., & Picard, M. H. (2013). Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 26(9), 921–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayreh, S. S. (2014). Ocular vascular occlusive disorders: Natural history of visual outcome. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 41, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayreh, S. S., Kolder, H. E., & Weingeist, T. A. (1980). Central retinal artery occlusion and retinal tolerance time. Ophthalmology, 87(1), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35283-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huttner, H. B., Kohrmann, M., Mauer, C., Lucking, H., Kloska, S., Doerfler, A., Schwab, S., & Schellinger, P. D. (2010). The prevalence of peripheral arteriopathy is higher in ischaemic stroke as compared with transient ischaemic attack and intracerebral haemorrhage. International Journal of Stroke, 5(4), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00440.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, P. J., Lemmens, R., & Tsivgoulis, G. (2021). Inflammation and Stroke Risk: A New Target for Prevention. Stroke, 52(8), 2697–2706. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Langhorne, P., Ramachandra, S., Stroke Unit Trialists, C. (2020). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4(4):CD000197. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub4

  25. Lavin, P., Patrylo, M., Hollar, M., Espaillat, K. B., Kirshner, H., & Schrag, M. (2018). Stroke Risk and Risk Factors in Patients With Central Retinal Artery Occlusion. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 196, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Limaye, K., Wall, M., Uwaydat, S., Ali, S., Shaban, A., Al Kasab, S., & Adams, H., Jr. (2018). Is Management of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion the Next Frontier in Cerebrovascular Diseases? Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 27(10), 2781–2791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lytvynchuk, L. (2017). Embolectomy for branch retinal artery occlusion: A case report. Acta Ophthalmologica, 95(5), e428–e429. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mac Grory, B., Schrag, M., Biousse, V., Furie, K. L., Gerhard-Herman, M., Lavin, P. J., Sobrin, L., Tjoumakaris, S. I., Weyand, C. M., Yaghi, S., Stroke, A. H. A., & C., Council on Arteriosclerosis, T., Vascular, B., Council on, H., Council on Peripheral Vascular, D. (2021). Management of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Stroke, 52(6), e282–e294. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mac Grory, B., Schrag, M., Poli, S., Boisvert, C. J., Spitzer, M. S., Schultheiss, M., Nedelmann, M., Yaghi, S., Guhwe, M., Moore, E. E., Hewitt, H. R., Barter, K. M., Kim, T., Chen, M., Humayun, L., Peng, C., Chhatbar, P. Y., Lavin, P., Zhang, X., & Feng, W. (2021). Structural and Functional Imaging of the Retina in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion - Current Approaches and Future Directions. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 30(7), 105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Narula, N., Olin, J. W., & Narula, N. (2020). Pathologic Disparities Between Peripheral Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Disease. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 40(9), 1982–1989. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Trial, N. A. S. C. E., & C., Barnett, H. J. M., Taylor, D. W., Haynes, R. B., Sackett, D. L., Peerless, S. J., Ferguson, G. G., Fox, A. J., Rankin, R. N., Hachinski, V. C., Wiebers, D. O., Eliasziw, M. (1991). Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 325(7), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199108153250701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen, T. W., Pulido, J. S., Folk, J. C., Hyman, L., Flaxel, C. J., & Adelman, R. A. (2017). Retinal and Ophthalmic Artery Occlusions Preferred Practice Pattern(R). Ophthalmology, 124(2), P120–P143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Park, S. J., Choi, N. K., Yang, B. R., Park, K. H., Lee, J., Jung, S. Y., Woo, S. J. (2015). Risk and Risk Periods for Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Central Retinal Artery Occlusion. Ophthalmology, 122(11):2336–2343 e2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.018

  34. Pick, J., Nickels, S., Saalmann, F., Finger, R. P., & Schuster, A. K. (2020). Incidence of retinal artery occlusion in Germany. Acta Ophthalmologica, 98(5), e656–e657. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pula, J. H., Kwan, K., Yuen, C. A., & Kattah, J. C. (2016). Update on the evaluation of transient vision loss. Clinical Ophthalmology, 10, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94971

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Raber, F. P., Gmeiner, F. V., Dreyhaupt, J., Wolf, A., Ludolph, A. C., Werner, J. U., Kassubek, J., & Althaus, K. (2023). Thrombolysis in central retinal artery occlusion: A retrospective observational study. Journal of Neurology, 270(2), 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11439-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sacco, R. L., Kasner, S. E., Broderick, J. P., Caplan, L. R., Connors, J. J., Culebras, A., Elkind, M. S., George, M. G., Hamdan, A. D., Higashida, R. T., Hoh, B. L., Janis, L. S., Kase, C. S., Kleindorfer, D. O., Lee, J. M., Moseley, M. E., Peterson, E. D., Turan, T. N., Valderrama, A. L., & Metabolism. (2013). An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 44(7), 2064–2089. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schumacher, M., Schmidt, D., Jurklies, B., Gall, C., Wanke, I., Schmoor, C., Maier-Lenz, H., Solymosi, L., Brueckmann, H., Neubauer, A.S., Wolf, A., Feltgen, N., Group, E. A.-S. (2010). Central retinal artery occlusion: local intra-arterial fibrinolysis versus conservative treatment, a multicenter randomized trial. Ophthalmology, 117(7):1367–1375 e1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.061

  39. Shah, R., Gilbert, A., Melles, R., Patel, A., Do, T., Wolek, M., & Vora, R. A. (2023). Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Time to Presentation and Diagnosis. Ophthalmol Retina, 7(6), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2023.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tobalem, S., Schutz, J. S., & Chronopoulos, A. (2018). Central retinal artery occlusion - rethinking retinal survival time. BMC Ophthalmology, 18(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0768-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Uhr, J. H., Mishra, K., Wei, C., & Wu, A. Y. (2016). Awareness and Knowledge of Emergent Ophthalmic Disease Among Patients in an Internal Medicine Clinic. JAMA Ophthalmol, 134(4), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.6212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. von Weitzel-Mudersbach, P., Andersen, G., Hundborg, H. H., & Johnsen, S. P. (2013). Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke are the most common manifestations of acute cerebrovascular disease: A prospective, population-based study–the Aarhus TIA study. Neuroepidemiology, 40(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wardlaw, J.M., Murray, V., Berge, E., del Zoppo, G.J. (2014). Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(7):CD000213. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000213.pub3

  44. Webster, A. C., Nagler, E. V., Morton, R. L., & Masson, P. (2017). Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet, 389(10075), 1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, B., Yang, P., Xu, X., Shao, L. (2019). C-reactive protein for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Biosci Rep, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20181135

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No funding was provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Norma J. Diel, Stefan T. Gerner, Thorsten R. Doeppner, Martin Juenemann, Toska Maxhuni, Tobias Frühwald, Andre Worm, Omar Alhaj Omar & Hagen B. Huttner

  2. Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Stefan T. Gerner, Thorsten R. Doeppner, Martin Juenemann & Hagen B. Huttner

  3. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Tobias Struffert

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk

  5. Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Pascal Bauer

Authors
  1. Norma J. Diel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan T. Gerner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thorsten R. Doeppner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Juenemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toska Maxhuni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tobias Frühwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andre Worm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Omar Alhaj Omar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tobias Struffert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pascal Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hagen B. Huttner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HBH and NJD contributed to design of the work and wrote the manuscript, STG and NJD evaluated clinical data and contributed to analysis. TRD, MBJ, TM, TF, AW and OAHO contributed to data acquisition and interpretation. LL, TS and PB performed examinations, evaluated clinical data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have revised and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norma J. Diel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany (reference AZ 220/21).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diel, N.J., Gerner, S.T., Doeppner, T.R. et al. Comparison of vascular risk profile and clinical outcomes among patients with central (branch) retinal artery occlusion versus amaurosis fugax. Neurol. Res. Pract. 6, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00326-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00326-3

Keywords

Neurological Research and Practice

ISSN: 2524-3489

Contact us