- Research article
- Open access
- Published:
Intracranial bleeding under vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants: results of the RADOA registry
Neurological Research and Practice volume 4, Article number: 16 (2022)
Abstract
Background and purpose
The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has increased sharply and DOAC are the oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) of choice for the majority of patients with newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Intracranial hemorrhage is the most severe adverse event of OAT. Systematic data on the course of intracranial hemorrhage under DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are warranted to enable shared decision making in AF patients needing OAT.
Methods
This is a secondary analysis of the patients with intracranial bleedings from the prospective multicenter emergency department-based RADOA registry, which collected data on patients admitted with major bleeding while taking VKA or DOAC. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality until day 30. We evaluated hematoma volume and short-term clinical outcomes in relation to the extent of active OAT according to coagulation parameters and OAT plasma levels measured by UPLC-MS/MS.
Results
Of 193 patients with major bleeding, 109 (56.5%) had intracranial hemorrhage [52.3% intracerebral (ICH), 33.9% subdural (SDH), 11.0% subarachnoidal (SAH)]. 64 (58.7%) were on VKA and 45 (41.2%) were on DOAC. On admission, we could confirm active anticoagulation in 97.7% of VKA-treated patients based on either INR > 1.3 or phenprocoumon levels and in 75.8% of DOAC-treated patients based on DOAC levels. Patients suffering an intracranial hemorrhage under VKA showed significantly larger hematoma volumes and a higher in-hospital mortality. Especially in intracerebral hemorrhage, we observed a higher initial severity and numerically greater proportion of early changes towards palliative therapy under VKA, which coincided with a numerically higher case fatality.
Conclusions
We show significantly smaller hematoma volumes for ICH and SDH under DOAC in comparison to VKA and a significantly lower 30-day in-hospital mortality rate of DOAC-ICH, even before the introduction of specific antidotes. These data strongly support the use of DOAC whenever possible in patients requiring OAT.
Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01722786.
Introduction
The large phase III trials leading to the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) unanimously showed that direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment was associated with a lower rate of hemorrhagic stroke than treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) while being at least equally effective in preventing ischemic stroke in patients with AF [1]. But while intracranial hemorrhage as a severe complication of long-term anticoagulation was less frequent, the mortality rate did not differ significantly between both OAT regimes in those trials [2, 3]. Since then, several real life analyses of large health insurance databanks have confirmed a favorable safety profile of DOAC in comparison to VKA with regard to mortality, ischemic events and hemorrhagic stroke [4]. Studies on the management and clinical course of intracranial hemorrhage under oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) that detail hematoma volume, hematoma expansion, coagulation parameters and reversal strategies under oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) are mostly retrospective [5, 6] or report patients preselected by clinical field (e.g. registries from stroke units or neurological intensive care units) [7, 8] and hence are vulnerable to different types of biases. A meta-analysis of 19 trials comparing haematoma volume, hematoma expansion, and mortality in VKA-ICH vs. non-OAT-ICH established a more unfavourable course of all these parameters in VKA-ICH patients [7]. Concerning differences between the different OAT regimens, individual studies so far yielded conflicting results concerning hematoma volumes and expansion as well as outcome of the two most common bleeding entities, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) [8, 9] and subdural hematoma (SDH) [10, 11] under DOAC vs. VKA. Our prospective multicenter registry, which enrolled patients at the level of the emergency departments (ED), adds a well-defined cohort characterized by a virtually complete capture of patients with intracranial hemorrhage even in the case of an early decision to pursue palliative therapy with a laboratory-aided acquisition of patients’ coagulation status and reversal strategies.
Methods
RADOA registry
The design of the prospective, observational, non-interventional, open-label, investigator-initiated multicenter German registry of severe hemorrhage under OAT has been described previously in more detail [12, 13]. All 10 study centers had to document efforts directed at consecutive enrollment via a screening log and were subject to 100% independent on site data monitoring. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC) of Frankfurt University Hospital with secondary approvals by all relevant IECs. Primary endpoint in the registry was in-hospital mortality up to day 30.
Patients
Patients on OAT with severe hemorrhage and/or urgent interventions were enrolled at the level of the ED and the clinical course and outcome were prospectively documented up to 30 days. For this analysis, all patients with intracranial hemorrhage were selected.
ICH and SDH volumetry
A board-certified neurologist (AAH) blinded to all other patient data centrally quantified hematoma volume using the ABC/2 method, which is well-established for ICH [14] but also validated for SDH [15]. Hematoma expansion was defined as an increase in volume > 12.5 mL or 33% volume increase.
Coagulation analyses and definition of ‘active OAT’
Routine laboratory parameters including hematology, INR/PT, and aPTT were recorded on admission and during the course of in-hospital stay. Concentrations of DOACs and VKA were measured in back-up blood samples from routine care at the Institute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Centre, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany using UPLC-MS/MS analysis.
Active OAT in case of VKA was defined as an INR > 1.3 and/or a phenprocoumon plasma level of > 0.2 mg/L. In case of DOAC, a plasma DOAC level of > 30 ng/mL and/or a last intake < 12 h for apixaban and < 24 h for rivaroxaban and edoxaban was required. Four patients without DOAC level quantification and without known last intake were classified as OAT-negative.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and are compared between groups with nonparametric Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test. Categorical variables are reported as counts and rates in percent and compared between groups by the exact Fisher test. Kaplan Meier curves are used for illustrating and log-rank tests are used for comparing 30 days in hospital survival data, respectively. All statistical tests were two-sided and used a significance level of alpha = 5%.
Results
Among 193 patients with major bleeding, 109 (56.5%) had intracranial hemorrhage (52.3% intracerebral [ICH], 33.9% subdural [SDH], 11.0% subarachnoidal [SAH]). 64 (58.7%) were on VKA and 45 (41.2%) were on DOAC. The respective share of VKA and DOAC did not differ significantly between bleeding locations and the distribution of age and sex, physiological variables and risk factors for AF-associated stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score) and bleeding under OAT (HAS-BLED score) was well-balanced between patients on VKA and DOAC (Table 1). Notably, 35.7% of intracranial hemorrhages were related to a reported fall or accident (Table 2). Focusing on ICH and SDH as the two most frequent types of intracranial bleeding with quantifiable hematoma volumes, we found concordantly greater hematoma volumes in patients on VKA compared with DOAC (ICH: 63.8 mL ± 59.3 vs. 20.7 mL ± 26.6; p = 0.001; SDH: 125 mL ± 58.5 vs. 69.7 mL ± 61.2; p = 0.029, Table 2 and Fig. 1C) with a numerically larger proportion of intraventricular hemorrhage in ICH under VKA, whereas small hematoma (< 30 mL) was more frequent in ICH and SDH under DOAC. In ICH patients, we found equal rates of ‘no hematoma expansion’ (55% in DOAC-ICH vs 56% in VKA-ICH) but follow-up imaging was unavailable in a significantly larger share of VKA-ICH patients (24% vs. 0% of DOAC-ICH). This corresponded to a higher proportion of patients with VKA-ICH being switched to palliative care in the first 24 h as well as during the course of the hospital stay. In SDH, we found a higher rate of hematoma expansion in DOAC-SDH as compared to VKA-SDH against a background of significantly smaller hematomas on first imaging and there was no significant difference of mortality between the two groups in SDH patients, who overall showed a lower 30 day in-hospital mortality compared to ICH patients (Table 2, Fig. 1B).
Patients with ICH under VKA were more often comatose, required mechanical ventilation and had a lower initial blood pressure, which could be interpreted as a marker of higher disease severity (e.g. mechanical ventilation requiring analgosedation). We observed a statistically non-significant higher frequency of neurosurgical procedures and a significantly higher 30 day in-hospital mortality in VKA-ICH vs. DOAC-ICH (VKA: 37.5% vs. DOAC: 12.0%; 95% confidence interval for the rate difference from 3 to 44%; p = 0.0374; Table 2, Fig. 1A).
Concerning the level of anticoagulation, we could confirm active anticoagulation in all 55 patients of patients with VKA-associated ICH or SDH by means of either an INR > 1.3 (n = 46/55, 84%) or mass-spectrometry measurements of phenprocoumon levels (n = 43/44, 98%) and in 84.6% of DOAC-associated ICH or SDH by means of mass-spectrometry DOAC level measurements (n = 25/33, 76%) or medical history (n = 14/17, 82%). Notably, we observed a fairly high frequency of four factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) application, which was the only available strategy in patients treated with VKA and with DOACs (solely direct factor Xa inhibitors), during the time of patient accrual. Guideline-recommended doses of 30–50 mg/kg BW were used in approximately 70% of all the reversals in ICH patients but only 45% of SDH patients. No significant difference was observed in 30 day in-hospital mortality between patients who received PCC and patients who did not.
Discussion
In our prospective multicenter registry enrolling patients with major bleeding under OAT, we found a high proportion of intracranial bleedings. Since patients were enrolled at the level of the emergency department, our population was broader and less selective than other ongoing registry trials that target neurology/neurosurgery departments. This may explain the considerably larger mean hematoma volume in patients (> 60 mL) with VKA-ICH in comparison to these registries [7, 9]. 25% of the VKA-ICH patients did not receive a follow-up CT scan. In a life-threatening situation, this most probably indicates that they were switched to palliative care, which was explicitly documented in 18% of this group. These patients may well be missed by registries that capture patients only after being transferred to specialist NICU or stroke unit care. This could lead to an underestimation of the severity and high mortality of VKA-ICH. By contrast, the mean hematoma volume reported for DOAC-ICH was well in the range of previously published registry data for DOAC-ICH [9]. While VKA-ICH was associated with a high mortality rate of 37.5% and the majority of deaths occurred within the first five days after hospital admission, the mortality rate of DOAC-ICH was significantly lower (12%). SDH under DOAC also showed smaller initial hematoma volumes than SDH under VKA, but the 30-day in-hospital mortality, which was generally lower, did not differ between the two OAT regimens. Most notably, half of the SDH under both OAT regimens were fall-associated, indicating the need for preventive measures.
By virtue of the measurements of phenprocoumon plasma levels, we were able to show that all patients with VKA-ICH were actively anticoagulated at the time of ICH. This differs significantly from other registries that rely on the INR and show rates of apparently subtherapeutic anticoagulation as high as 16% [9]. The inclusion of patients that received PCCs prior to the transport from a primary hospital to a larger center where they were enrolled into the registry after INR normalization may lead to this discrepancy. Determination of DOAC-concentrations also allowed us to confirm active anticoagulation in the majority of DOAC-ICH. The neutral results concerning a significant association of PCC reversal of OAT with a lower 30-day in-hospital mortality should not be overinterpreted due to the small sample size.
Conclusions
This is the first multicenter registry consecutively enrolling patients with intracranial bleeding at the level of the emergency department circumventing some of the biases of registries enrolling at specialist care level. We show significantly larger hematoma volumes for ICH and SDH under VKA in comparison to DOAC and a significantly higher 30-day in-hospital mortality rate of VKA-ICH. These data strongly support the use of DOAC whenever possible in patients requiring OAT.
Availability of data and materials
The data are available from the senior author (Prof. Dr. Edelgard Lindhoff-Last) upon request.
References
Pan, K. L., Singer, D. E., Ovbiagele, B., Wu, Y. L., Ahmed, M. A., & Lee, M. (2017). Effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6, e005835.
Hart, R. G., Diener, H. C., Yang, S., Connolly, S. J., Wallentin, L., Reilly, P. A., Ezekowitz, M. D., & Yusuf, S. (2012). Intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: the RE-LY trial. Stroke, 43, 1511–1517.
Hankey, G. J., Stevens, S. R., Piccini, J. P., Lokhnygina, Y., Mahaffey, K. W., Halperin, J. L., Patel, M. R., Breithardt, G., Singer, D. E., Becker, R. C., et al. (2014). ROCKET AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Stroke. Intracranial hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation anticoagulated with warfarin or rivaroxaban: the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation. Stroke, 45, 1304–12.
López-López, J. A., Sterne, J. A. C., Thom, H. H. Z., Higgins, J. P. T., Hingorani, A. D., Okoli, G. N., Davies, P. A., Bodalia, P. N., Bryden, P. A., Welton, N. J., et al. (2017). Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ, 359, j5058.
Wilson, D., Seiffge, D. J., Traenka, C., Basir, G., Purrucker, J. C., Rizos, T., Sobowale, O. A., Sallinen, H., Yeh, S. J., Wu, T. Y., et al. (2017). And the CROMIS-2 collaborators. Outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with different oral anticoagulants. Neurology, 88, 1693–1700.
Kurogi, R., Nishimura, K., Nakai, M., Kada, A., Kamitani, S., Nakagawara, J., Toyoda, K., Ogasawara, K., Ono, J., Shiokawa, Y., et al. (2018). J-ASPECT study collaborators. Neurology, 90, e1143–e1149.
Seiffge, D. J., Goeldlin, M. B., Tatlisumak, T., Lyrer, P., Fischer, U., Engelter, S. T., & Werring, D. J. (2019). Meta-analysis of haematoma volume, haematoma expansion and mortality in intracerebral haemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant use. Journal of Neurology, 266, 3126–3135.
Tsivgoulis, G., Lioutas, V. A., Varelas, P., Katsanos, A. H., Goyal, N., Mikulik, R., Barlinn, K., Krogias, C., Sharma, V. K., Vadikolias, K., et al. (2017). Direct oral anticoagulant– vs vitamin K antagonist–related nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology, 89, 1142–1151.
Gerner, S. T., Kuramatsu, J. B., Sembill, J. A., Sprügel, M. I., Hagen, M., Knappe, R. U., Endres, M., Haeusler, K. G., Sobesky, J., Schurig, J., et al. (2019). Characteristics in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke, 50, 1392–1402.
Beynon, C., Brenner, S., Younsi, A., Rizos, T., Neumann, J. O., Pfaff, J., & Unterberg, A. W. (2019). Management of patients with acute subdural hemorrhage during treatment with direct oral anticoagulants. Neurocritical Care, 30, 322–333.
Won, S. Y., Dubinski, D., Bruder, M., Cattani, A., Seifert, V., & Konczalla, J. (2017). Acute subdural hematoma in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy: Management and outcome. Neurosurgical Focus, 43, E12.
Lindhoff-Last, E. (2017). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)—Management of emergency situations. Hämostaseologie, 37, 257–266.
Lindhoff-Last, E., Herrmann, E., Lindau, S., Konstantinides, S., Grottke, O., Nowak-Goettl, U., Lucks, J., Zydek, B., Heymann, C. V., Birschmann, I., et al. (2020). Severe Hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulants. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 117, 312–319.
Kothari, R. U., Brott, T., Broderick, J. P., Barsan, W. G., Sauerbeck, L. R., Zuccarello, M., & Khoury, J. (1996). The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke, 27, 1304–1305.
Won, S. Y., Zagorcic, A., Dubinski, D., Quick-Weller, J., Herrmann, E., Seifert, V., & Konczalla, J. (2018). Excellent accuracy of ABC/2 volume formula compared to computer-assisted volumetric analysis of subdural hematomas. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0199809.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Sina Hehn, M.D., Department of Medicine II/University Cancer Center Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, who provided support in the development of the online Case Report Form of the Registry; Sebastian Harder, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, who gave advice on ethical issues; Joachim Kuhn, Institute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Centre, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, who performed the masspectrometry analysis of the VKA- and DOAC-levels. Hartmut Clausnizer, MD, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Thrombosis & Haemostasis Treatment Center, University Hospital, Kiel-Lübeck, Germany, and Norbert Weiler, MD, Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany, who recruited patients.
Funding
This work was funded by Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, DAIICHI Sankyo and CSL Behring. The pharmaceutical companies which funded this project had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data or the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Waltraud Pfeilschifter was responsible for the conceptualization and evaluation of the management and outcome of intracranial bleeding and wrote the original draft of the manuscript, Edelgard Lindhoff-Last was responsible for the conceptualization and the methodology of the total RADOA-registry, organized funding acquisition and supported Waltraud Pfeilschifter in writing the original draft of the manuscript; Ali Alhashim performed research on methodology and evaluated the cerebral CT scans and hematoma volumes in a blinded manner, Ingvild Birschmann performed the masspectrometry analysis of the DOAC- and VKA-levels, Simone Lindau, Stavros Konstantinides, Oliver Grottke, Ulrike Nowak-Goettl, Barbara Zydek, Christian von Heymann, Ingvild Birschmann, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Patrick Meybohm and Andreas Greinacher recruited patients and supported the writing of the manuscript; Barbara Zydek was responsible for the project administration; Eva Herrmann performed the statistical analysis and was responsible for the validation and visualization of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC) of Frankfurt University Hospital with secondary approvals by all relevant IECs.
Consent for publication
Does not apply.
Competing interests
Waltraud Pfeilschifter has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Alexion, and institutional research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. Edelgard Lindhoff-Last has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Portola, CSL Behring, Alexion and Aspen and institutional research support from Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo and CSL-Behring. Ali Alhashim: none declared. Ingvild Birschmann has received speaker’s honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Siemens Healthcare, LFB biomedicaments and CSL Behring and reimbursement for congress travelling and accommodation from Aspen and Bristol-Myers Squibb. She has performed contract research for Siemens Healthcare and is a member of the advisory board of LFB biomedicaments and of the expert groups of CSL Behring GmbH and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH. Simone Lindau: none declared. Stavros Konstantinides has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Actelion, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and institutional research support from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Actelion, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Oliver Grottke has received research funding from Alveron, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotest, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed and Portola. He has also received honoraria for lectures and consultancy support from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Sanofi, Shire, Pfizer and Portola. Ulrike Nowak-Goettl has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Octapharma and LFB. Barbara Zydek: none declared. Christian von Heymann has received honoraria for lectures and consultancy work potentially related to this topic, as well as travel reimbursements from Bayer GmbH, Biotest GmbH, Pfizer GmbH, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, NovoNordisk GmbH, and HICC GbR. Jan Beyer-Westendorf has received personal honoraria (lectures, advisory boards) and travel support from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Portola and institutional research support from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, LEO, Pfizer, and Portola. Patrick Meybohm has received grants from B. Braun Melsungen, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, and Vifor Pharma for the implementation of Frankfurt’s Patient Blood Management program and honoraria for scientific lectures from B. Braun Melsungen, Vifor Pharma, Fearing, CSL Behring, and Pharmacosmos. Andreas Greinacher has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer and Daiichi-Sankyo, ASPEN. Eva Herrmann: none declared.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pfeilschifter, W., Lindhoff-Last, E., Alhashim, A. et al. Intracranial bleeding under vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants: results of the RADOA registry. Neurol. Res. Pract. 4, 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00183-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00183-y